StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
AUUD$1.40-0.71%
Fair $1.40+0.0%

AUUD

Auddia Inc.

Technology / Software - ApplicationNasdaqCM

$1.40

-0.01 (-0.71%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.40Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 17/F
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-6.1M · quality 67.7/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 39/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

17/100

F

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

20/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 7Warnings: 1unknown: 7
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -1.8%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · AUUDLocal privado en este navegador · Auddia Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$8M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-181.6%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.03

↓
52-Week Range$1
$1$57

TradingView lightweight chart

AUUD price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.400Periodo -100.0%
Fair value: $1.400

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2019–2025 · 6 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

—

FCF / Net income

0.85x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue — · net income $-7.7M · FCF $-6.5M

2019-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

—— pts

FCF margin

—— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
Income Statement
Revenue—————$0.00$110924.00$458826.00
Net Income$-7.7M$-7.7M$-8.7M$-8.8M$-6.9M$-13.5M$-4.1M$-5.2M
EBITDA$-5.0M$-5.0M$-6.5M$-5.6M$-5.7M$-5.4M$-2.0M$-3.1M
EPS-43.12-43.12-444.21-1692.54-1805.11-4282.95——
Operating Margin——————-2148.2%-828.7%
Net Margin——————-3652.2%-1139.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.030.030.027.200.46———
Current Ratio2.302.30——————
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-6.5M$-6.5M$-6.1M$-5.5M$-6.7M$-5.6M$-2.0M$-3.0M
Returns
ROE-181.6%-181.6%-185.8%-2094.9%-179.2%-143.2%30.9%56.7%
Valuation
P/B0.060.060.2910.283.24———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth—————-100.0%-75.8%—
EPS Growth90.3%90.3%73.8%6.2%————

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -95.5%

Total return

-95.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-444.21 → -43.12

Residual

-95.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-95.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.