StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
BAR.BR$9.22+0.93%
Fair $9.22+0.0%

BAR.BR

Barco NV

Technology / Electronic ComponentsBrussels

$9.22

+0.09 (+0.93%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $9.22Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 42/C
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 26% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $60.9M · quality 63.3/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 49/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

42/100

C

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · BAR.BRLocal privado en este navegador · Barco NV
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$751M

P/E

10.9x

↓

EV/EBITDA

4.4x

↓

ROE

10.0%

↑

Gross Margin

40.1%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.10

↓
52-Week Range$9
$9$15

TradingView lightweight chart

BAR.BR price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $9.225Periodo -35.7%
Fair value: $9.225

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-3.1%

FCF CAGR

+109.9%

FCF margin

6.3%

FCF / Net income

0.85x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $963.8M · net income $71.6M · FCF $60.9M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

40.1%+1.1% pts

Operating margin

8.3%-0.1% pts

Net margin

7.4%+0.3% pts

FCF margin

6.3%+5.7% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$963.8M$963.8M$946.6M$1.05B$1.06B
Net Income$71.6M$71.6M$63.0M$80.2M$75.2M
EBITDA$130.2M$130.2M$118.4M$135.5M$126.7M
EPS——0.710.890.83
Gross Margin40.1%40.1%40.7%41.8%39.0%
Operating Margin8.3%8.3%6.4%9.3%8.4%
Net Margin7.4%7.4%6.7%7.6%7.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.100.100.130.060.06
Current Ratio2.602.60———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$60.9M$60.9M$100.6M$40.0M$6.6M
Returns
ROE10.0%10.0%7.9%10.1%9.9%
Valuation
P/E10.8510.8514.5417.7829.01
EV/EBITDA4.394.395.618.8915.12
P/B1.061.061.161.812.87
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth1.8%1.8%-9.9%-0.8%—
EPS Growth——-20.2%7.2%—
Dividend Yield6.0%6.0%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -25.6%

Total return

-25.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.71 → n/d

Residual

-31.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+6.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-31.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.