StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
BDTX$2.26+1.80%
Fair $2.26+0.0%

BDTX

Black Diamond Therapeutics, Inc.

Healthcare / BiotechnologyNasdaqGS

$2.26

+0.04 (+1.80%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $2.26Fund rank 33/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 36/D
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-62.3M · quality 69.3/100

Data gap 33/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 49/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

36/100

D

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

20/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 8Warnings: 0unknown: 8
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific biotech pipeline model required: targets are disabled until product, probability, peak-sales and cash-runway data exists.
Thesis & Journal · BDTXLocal privado en este navegador · Black Diamond Therapeutics, Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$130M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

6.3x

↓

ROE

19.9%

↑

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.17

↓
52-Week Range$2
$2$5

TradingView lightweight chart

BDTX price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $2.260Periodo -94.0%
Fair value: $2.260

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2018–2025 · 7 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

42.3%

FCF / Net income

1.32x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $70.0M · net income $22.4M · FCF $29.6M

2018-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

28.4%— pts

Net margin

32.0%— pts

FCF margin

42.3%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
Income Statement
Revenue$70.0M$70.0M————$0.00$0.00$0.00
Net Income$22.4M$22.4M$-69.7M$-82.4M$-91.2M$-125.6M$-67.3M$-35.3M$-8.9M
EBITDA$20.2M$20.2M$-78.4M$-86.0M$-92.3M————
EPS——-1.27-1.88-2.52-3.47-2.05——
Operating Margin28.4%28.4%———————
Net Margin32.0%32.0%———————
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.170.170.270.220.24————
Current Ratio8.468.46———————
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$29.6M$29.6M$-62.3M$-66.8M$-85.3M$-102.9M$-52.3M$-24.7M$-8.5M
Returns
ROE19.9%19.9%-83.7%-70.6%-78.8%-64.1%-21.9%74.8%57.5%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA6.286.28———————
P/B1.151.151.451.030.65————
Growth & Yield
EPS Growth——32.4%25.4%—-69.3%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +2.7%

Total return

+2.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-1.27 → n/d

Residual

+2.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+2.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.