StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
BEAMMW-B.ST$14.90-8.36%
Fair $14.90+0.0%

BEAMMW-B.ST

BeammWave AB (publ)

Technology / SemiconductorsStockholm

$14.90

-1.36 (-8.36%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $14.90Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 25/D
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 20%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-22.5M · quality 54.3/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 36/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

25/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -18.7%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · BEAMMW-B.STLocal privado en este navegador · BeammWave AB (publ)
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$681M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-18.7%

↓

Gross Margin

528.5%

↑

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$15
$6$20

TradingView lightweight chart

BEAMMW-B.ST price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $14.90Periodo +21.1%
Fair value: $14.90

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-1049.0%

FCF / Net income

1.10x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $2.6M · net income $-24.8M · FCF $-27.2M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

528.5%— pts

Operating margin

-973.0%— pts

Net margin

-956.5%— pts

FCF margin

-1049.0%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$2.6M$2.6M$1.1M——
Net Income$-24.8M$-24.8M$-22.8M$-20.2M$-15.7M
EBITDA$-23.0M$-23.0M$-22.8M$-20.2M$-15.7M
EPS-0.54-0.54-0.68-1.27-0.99
Gross Margin528.5%528.5%1292.7%——
Operating Margin-973.0%-973.0%-2176.5%——
Net Margin-956.5%-956.5%-2143.2%——
Balance Sheet
Current Ratio51.8051.80———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-27.2M$-27.2M$-22.5M$-16.6M$-27.1M
Returns
ROE-18.7%-18.7%-29.4%-39.6%-22.1%
Valuation
P/B5.135.132.194.022.42
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth143.2%143.2%———
EPS Growth20.1%20.1%46.3%-28.3%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +33.0%

Total return

+33.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.68 → -0.54

Residual

+33.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+33.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.