StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
BEER.HE$2.46+0.00%
Fair $2.46+0.0%

BEER.HE

Nokian Panimo Oyj

Consumer Defensive / Beverages - BrewersHelsinki

$2.46

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $2.46Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 22/D
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 20%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $95604.50 · quality 55.3/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 30/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

22/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 1unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -0.4%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · BEER.HELocal privado en este navegador · Nokian Panimo Oyj
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$25M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

32.9x

↑

ROE

-0.4%

↓

Gross Margin

57.9%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.29

↓
52-Week Range$2
$2$3

TradingView lightweight chart

BEER.HE price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $2.490Periodo -0.4%
Fair value: $2.460

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2025 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+12.5%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-23.3%

FCF / Net income

44.19x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $13.0M · net income $-68547.5 · FCF $-3.0M

2023-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

57.9%+5.2% pts

Operating margin

11.3%+1.1% pts

Net margin

-0.5%-8.0% pts

FCF margin

-23.3%-35.3% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$13.0M$13.0M$11.9M$10.3M
Net Income$-68547.48$-68547.48$1.1M$768000.00
EBITDA$897612.68$897612.68$2.4M$1.7M
EPS——0.110.08
Gross Margin57.9%57.9%57.2%52.7%
Operating Margin11.3%11.3%16.0%10.2%
Net Margin-0.5%-0.5%9.3%7.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.290.290.510.58
Current Ratio3.083.08——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-3.0M$-3.0M$95604.50$1.2M
Returns
ROE-0.4%-0.4%17.2%14.2%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA32.8832.88——
P/B1.521.52——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth9.4%9.4%15.7%—
EPS Growth——44.0%—
Dividend Yield1.2%1.2%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +1.0%

Total return

+1.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.11 → n/d

Residual

-0.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+1.2%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-0.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.