StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
BESS.JK$1015.00+0.00%
Fair $1015.00+0.0%

BESS.JK

PT Batulicin Nusantara Maritim Tbk

Industrials / Marine ShippingJakarta

$1015.00

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1015.00Fund rank 37/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 40/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 25% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $122.5B · quality 72.0/100

Data gap 37/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 70/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

40/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 0unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · BESS.JKLocal privado en este navegador · PT Batulicin Nusantara Maritim Tbk
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$3.49T

P/E

123.5x

↑

EV/EBITDA

49.5x

↑

ROE

9.6%

↑

Gross Margin

37.3%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.02

↓
52-Week Range$1015
$870$2220

TradingView lightweight chart

BESS.JK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1,015Periodo +470.2%
Fair value: $1,015

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2025 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-1.4%

FCF CAGR

+2.2%

FCF margin

36.2%

FCF / Net income

2.01x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $353.70B · net income $63.60B · FCF $127.90B

2023-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

37.3%+1.7% pts

Operating margin

18.2%-4.3% pts

Net margin

18.0%-3.9% pts

FCF margin

36.2%+2.5% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$353.70B$353.70B$318.87B$363.74B
Net Income$63.60B$63.60B$24.20B$79.42B
EBITDA$67.09B$67.09B$37.17B$95.97B
EPS——7.0423.09
Gross Margin37.3%37.3%31.0%35.6%
Operating Margin18.2%18.2%11.8%22.6%
Net Margin18.0%18.0%7.6%21.8%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.020.020.050.16
Current Ratio6.496.49——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$127.90B$127.90B$16.73B$122.50B
Returns
ROE9.6%9.6%4.1%14.0%
Valuation
P/E123.48123.4848.8610.13
EV/EBITDA49.5149.5130.718.12
P/B5.295.291.991.41
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth10.9%10.9%-12.3%—
EPS Growth——-69.5%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -28.5%

Total return

-28.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

7.04 → n/d

Residual

-28.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-28.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.