StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
BGI$0.62-1.59%
Fair $0.62+0.0%

BGI

Birks Group Inc.

Consumer Cyclical / Luxury GoodsNYSE American

$0.62

-0.01 (-1.59%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.62Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 21/D
F-Score: 1/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 20%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-9.5M · quality 55.3/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 26/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

21/100

D

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · BGILocal privado en este navegador · Birks Group Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$12M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

70.9x

↑

ROE

71.2%

↑

Gross Margin

37.3%

↑

Debt/Equity

-8.07

↓
52-Week Range$1
$1$2

TradingView lightweight chart

BGI price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.630Periodo -91.0%
Fair value: $0.620

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-0.7%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-5.3%

FCF / Net income

0.74x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $177.8M · net income $-12.8M · FCF $-9.5M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

37.3%-4.7% pts

Operating margin

-0.5%-3.0% pts

Net margin

-7.2%-7.9% pts

FCF margin

-5.3%-12.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$177.8M$177.8M$185.3M$162.9M$181.3M
Net Income$-12.8M$-12.8M$-4.6M$-7.4M$1.3M
EBITDA$2.2M$2.2M$7.8M$1.9M$10.3M
EPS-0.66-0.66-0.24-0.400.07
Gross Margin37.3%37.3%39.7%41.7%42.0%
Operating Margin-0.5%-0.5%0.7%-2.3%2.5%
Net Margin-7.2%-7.2%-2.5%-4.6%0.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-8.07-8.07-30.42-251.9923.94
Current Ratio0.880.88———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-9.5M$-9.5M$-7.4M$-16.3M$12.8M
Returns
ROE71.2%71.2%89.9%1232.5%21.9%
Valuation
P/E————76.43
EV/EBITDA70.9370.9327.42162.3823.24
P/B————17.15
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-4.0%-4.0%13.7%-10.1%—
EPS Growth-175.0%-175.0%40.0%-671.4%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -33.3%

Total return

-33.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.24 → -0.66

Residual

-33.3%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-33.3%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.