StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
BIM.PA$71.50-3.83%
Fair $71.50+0.0%

BIM.PA

bioMérieux S.A.

Healthcare / Diagnostics & ResearchParis

$71.50

-2.85 (-3.83%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $71.50Fund rank 34/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 46/C
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $321.5M · quality 70.0/100

Data gap 34/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 65/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

46/100

C

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · BIM.PALocal privado en este navegador · bioMérieux S.A.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$8.4B

P/E

21.4x

↑

EV/EBITDA

9.8x

↓

ROE

9.7%

↑

Gross Margin

56.7%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.11

↓
52-Week Range$72
$68$128

TradingView lightweight chart

BIM.PA price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $71.50Periodo +615.0%
Fair value: $71.50

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+4.3%

FCF CAGR

+34.0%

FCF margin

11.1%

FCF / Net income

1.14x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $4.07B · net income $397.5M · FCF $453.1M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

56.7%+0.8% pts

Operating margin

17.1%-0.4% pts

Net margin

9.8%-2.8% pts

FCF margin

11.1%+5.9% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$4.07B$4.07B$3.98B$3.67B$3.59B
Net Income$397.5M$397.5M$432.2M$357.6M$452.4M
EBITDA$848.6M$848.6M$897.5M$712.2M$832.6M
EPS——3.643.013.82
Gross Margin56.7%56.7%55.7%56.0%56.0%
Operating Margin17.1%17.1%16.0%15.5%17.4%
Net Margin9.8%9.8%10.9%9.7%12.6%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.110.110.120.140.14
Current Ratio2.392.39———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$453.1M$453.1M$321.5M$107.1M$188.4M
Returns
ROE9.7%9.7%10.3%9.5%12.6%
Valuation
P/E21.4121.4128.0532.5425.31
EV/EBITDA9.819.8113.5616.5713.70
P/B2.062.062.883.103.18
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth2.3%2.3%8.3%2.4%—
EPS Growth——20.9%-21.2%—
Dividend Yield1.3%1.3%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -39.3%

Total return

-39.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

3.64 → n/d

Residual

-40.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+1.3%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-40.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.