StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
BIO.AX$0.21-4.44%
Fair $0.21+0.0%

BIO.AX

Biome Australia Limited

Consumer Defensive / Packaged FoodsASX

$0.21

-0.01 (-4.44%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.21Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 13/F
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 21%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-3.5M · quality 58.7/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 27/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

13/100

F

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -57.5%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · BIO.AXLocal privado en este navegador · Biome Australia Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$49M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-57.5%

↓

Gross Margin

60.8%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.45

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

BIO.AX price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.215Periodo +79.2%
Fair value: $0.215

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2024 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-1.4%

FCF / Net income

0.11x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $13.0M · net income $-1.7M · FCF $-185413.0

2021-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

60.8%— pts

Operating margin

-14.9%— pts

Net margin

-12.8%— pts

FCF margin

-1.4%— pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$13.0M$13.0M$7.2M$4.1M—
Net Income$-1.7M$-1.7M$-3.1M$-4.5M—
EBITDA$-1.3M$-1.3M$-2.8M$-4.4M—
EPS-0.01-0.01-0.02-0.03—
Gross Margin60.8%60.8%59.1%57.8%—
Operating Margin-14.9%-14.9%-46.4%-116.1%—
Net Margin-12.8%-12.8%-42.5%-110.4%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.450.450.320.070.01
Current Ratio2.002.00———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-185413.00$-185413.00$-3.9M$-3.5M—
Returns
ROE-57.5%-57.5%-85.8%-69.6%—
Valuation
P/B15.4015.405.882.03—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth79.8%79.8%75.9%——
EPS Growth47.7%47.7%40.5%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -54.3%

Total return

-54.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.02 → -0.01

Residual

-54.3%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-54.3%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.