StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
BMA.OL$20.80+0.00%
Fair $20.80+0.0%

BMA.OL

Byggma ASA

Industrials / Building Products & EquipmentOslo

$20.80

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $20.80Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 44/C
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 25% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $156.0M · quality 53.7/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 60/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

44/100

C

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · BMA.OLLocal privado en este navegador · Byggma ASA
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.5B

P/E

11.4x

↓

EV/EBITDA

9.1x

↓

ROE

10.6%

↑

Gross Margin

49.5%

↑

Debt/Equity

1.26

↑
52-Week Range$21
$12$24

TradingView lightweight chart

BMA.OL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $21.60Periodo +145.5%
Fair value: $20.80

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-2.1%

FCF CAGR

-5.4%

FCF margin

6.6%

FCF / Net income

1.44x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $2.36B · net income $108.3M · FCF $156.0M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

49.5%+2.5% pts

Operating margin

4.1%-1.6% pts

Net margin

4.6%-12.5% pts

FCF margin

6.6%-0.7% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$2.36B$2.36B$2.17B$2.23B$2.51B
Net Income$108.3M$108.3M$-258.6M$61.0M$429.8M
EBITDA$299.8M$299.8M$-85.4M$246.7M$651.2M
EPS——-3.700.876.16
Gross Margin49.5%49.5%51.2%50.9%47.1%
Operating Margin4.1%4.1%3.8%3.6%5.6%
Net Margin4.6%4.6%-11.9%2.7%17.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.261.261.551.271.36
Current Ratio0.720.72———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$156.0M$156.0M$19.8M$157.0M$184.5M
Returns
ROE10.6%10.6%-28.3%5.4%39.9%
Valuation
P/E11.3711.37—23.104.70
EV/EBITDA9.089.08—11.335.32
P/B1.421.421.281.241.88
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth8.4%8.4%-2.6%-11.1%—
EPS Growth——-525.3%-85.9%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +12.5%

Total return

+12.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-3.70 → n/d

Residual

+12.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+12.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.