StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
BPAI.CN$0.02+0.00%
Fair $0.02+0.0%

BPAI.CN

BrandPilot AI Inc.

Technology / Software - InfrastructureCanadian Sec

$0.02

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.02Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 21/D
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 23%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-1.3M · quality 68.7/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 33/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

21/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 4.9%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · BPAI.CNLocal privado en este navegador · BrandPilot AI Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$4M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

488.2%

↑

Gross Margin

64.8%

↑

Debt/Equity

-0.77

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

BPAI.CN price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.020Periodo -99.8%
Fair value: $0.020

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-711.3%

FCF / Net income

1.09x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $398023.0 · net income $-2.6M · FCF $-2.8M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

64.8%— pts

Operating margin

-587.6%— pts

Net margin

-653.9%— pts

FCF margin

-711.3%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$398023.00$398023.00$464372.00——
Net Income$-2.6M$-2.6M$-2.0M$-79915.00$-619152.00
EBITDA$-2.5M$-2.5M$-2.0M$-2.5M$-1.1M
EPS-0.02-0.02-0.04—-0.01
Gross Margin64.8%64.8%42.4%——
Operating Margin-587.6%-587.6%-395.7%——
Net Margin-653.9%-653.9%-436.6%——
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-0.77-0.77-0.49—0.10
Current Ratio0.260.26———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-2.8M$-2.8M$-1.2M$-1.3M$155930.00
Returns
ROE488.2%488.2%103.8%-2.6%-19.5%
Valuation
P/B———0.481.08
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-14.3%-14.3%———
EPS Growth54.5%54.5%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +0.0%

Total return

+0.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.04 → -0.02

Residual

+0.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+0.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.