StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
BPCINS.ST$17.00+5.26%
Fair $17.00+0.0%

BPCINS.ST

BPC Instruments AB

Healthcare / Medical Instruments & SuppliesStockholm

$17.00

+0.85 (+5.26%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $17.00Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 31/D
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 27% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $9.0M · quality 35.3/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 35/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

31/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · BPCINS.STLocal privado en este navegador · BPC Instruments AB
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$189M

P/E

21.0x

↑

EV/EBITDA

11.0x

↓

ROE

10.4%

↑

Gross Margin

75.4%

↑

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$17
$15$40

TradingView lightweight chart

BPCINS.ST price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $17.00Periodo +9.0%
Fair value: $17.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+24.6%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

7.0%

FCF / Net income

0.46x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $64.8M · net income $9.8M · FCF $4.5M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

75.4%+3.7% pts

Operating margin

13.3%-0.1% pts

Net margin

15.1%+3.7% pts

FCF margin

7.0%+13.1% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$64.8M$64.8M$62.4M$50.1M$33.6M
Net Income$9.8M$9.8M$13.5M$11.9M$3.8M
EBITDA$14.1M$14.1M$18.7M$16.6M$7.1M
EPS——1.291.140.37
Gross Margin75.4%75.4%74.8%75.6%71.7%
Operating Margin13.3%13.3%22.2%29.8%13.3%
Net Margin15.1%15.1%21.6%23.7%11.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity————0.05
Current Ratio10.2710.27———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$4.5M$4.5M$11.3M$9.0M$-2.1M
Returns
ROE10.4%10.4%21.5%24.7%10.6%
Valuation
P/E20.9920.9930.0732.0322.54
EV/EBITDA10.9610.9620.7322.2111.89
P/B2.002.006.467.902.38
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth3.9%3.9%24.5%49.4%—
EPS Growth——13.2%210.1%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -50.0%

Total return

-50.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

1.29 → n/d

Residual

-50.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-50.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.