StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
BWN.AX$0.30-1.64%
Fair $0.30+0.0%

BWN.AX

Bhagwan Marine Ltd

Industrials / Marine ShippingASX

$0.30

-0.00 (-1.64%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.30Fund rank 34/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 46/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 25% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $6.4M · quality 68.0/100

Data gap 34/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 59/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

46/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · BWN.AXLocal privado en este navegador · Bhagwan Marine Ltd
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$119M

P/E

15.0x

↓

EV/EBITDA

2.6x

↓

ROE

7.4%

↑

Gross Margin

93.5%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.39

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

BWN.AX price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.300Periodo -52.8%
Fair value: $0.300

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+28.1%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-0.9%

FCF / Net income

-0.20x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $283.0M · net income $12.5M · FCF $-2.5M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

93.5%+63.7% pts

Operating margin

7.8%+4.2% pts

Net margin

4.4%+2.6% pts

FCF margin

-0.9%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$283.0M$283.0M$269.8M$169.0M$134.7M
Net Income$12.5M$12.5M$5.5M$17.3M$2.4M
EBITDA$50.6M$50.6M$32.5M$37.7M$26.5M
EPS0.050.050.040.060.01
Gross Margin93.5%93.5%91.5%34.0%29.8%
Operating Margin7.8%7.8%6.3%10.0%3.6%
Net Margin4.4%4.4%2.1%10.2%1.8%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.390.391.20——
Current Ratio0.940.94———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-2.5M$-2.5M$15.4M——
Returns
ROE7.4%7.4%7.1%——
Valuation
P/E15.0015.00———
EV/EBITDA2.572.57———
P/B0.480.48———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth4.9%4.9%59.7%25.5%—
EPS Growth25.9%25.9%-41.0%623.0%—
Dividend Yield3.3%3.3%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-17.1%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.03

Spread vs growth

43.0%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

-7.2%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.03

Spread vs growth

33.0%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

1.1%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.05

Spread vs growth

24.8%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -37.8%

Total return

-37.8%

Start / end P/E

13.7x → 6.4x

EPS bridge

0.04 → 0.05

Residual

-13.8%

EPS growth+25.9%
Multiple rerating-53.3%
Dividend+3.3%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-13.8%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.