StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
CASA.IS$88.50+0.00%
Fair $88.50+0.0%

CASA.IS

Casa Emtia Petrol Kimyevi ve Turevleri San. Tic. A.S.

Consumer Cyclical / Specialty RetailIstanbul

$88.50

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $88.50Fund rank 23/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 4/F
F-Score: 1/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 16%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-54.0M · quality 44.3/100

Data gap 23/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 27/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

4/100

F

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 1unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -82.2%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · CASA.ISLocal privado en este navegador · Casa Emtia Petrol Kimyevi ve Turevleri San. Tic. A.S.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$434M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-82.2%

↓

Gross Margin

13.2%

↓

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$89
$81$141

TradingView lightweight chart

CASA.IS price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $88.30Periodo +650.8%
Fair value: $88.50

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2025 · 4 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+7.3%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-5.4%

FCF / Net income

0.47x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.14B · net income $-131.2M · FCF $-61.9M

2021-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

13.2%+6.8% pts

Operating margin

-10.0%-16.4% pts

Net margin

-11.5%-15.6% pts

FCF margin

-5.4%+0.8% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$1.14B$1.14B—$860.5M
Net Income$-131.2M$-131.2M$9.9M$35.6M
EBITDA$-114.7M$-114.7M$-1.5M$62.1M
EPS——2.037.27
Gross Margin13.2%13.2%—6.5%
Operating Margin-10.0%-10.0%—6.3%
Net Margin-11.5%-11.5%—4.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity———0.21
Current Ratio0.320.32——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-61.9M$-61.9M$-4.2M$-54.0M
Returns
ROE-82.2%-82.2%3.4%16.6%
Valuation
P/E——40.4015.55
EV/EBITDA———9.63
P/B2.722.721.382.59
Growth & Yield
EPS Growth——-72.1%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -14.3%

Total return

-14.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

2.03 → n/d

Residual

-14.3%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-14.3%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.