StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
CBLL$17.69+0.45%
Fair $17.69+0.0%

CBLL

CBLL

Healthcare / Medical DevicesNasdaqGS

$17.69

+0.08 (+0.45%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $17.69Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 33/D
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-36.4M · quality 73.0/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 39/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

33/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -34.4%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · CBLLLocal privado en este navegador · CBLL
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$671M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-34.4%

↓

Gross Margin

87.9%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.14

↓
52-Week Range$18
$11$24

TradingView lightweight chart

CBLL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $17.69Periodo -29.2%
Fair value: $17.69

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+50.9%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-46.7%

FCF / Net income

0.78x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $89.1M · net income $-53.4M · FCF $-41.6M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

87.9%+5.0% pts

Operating margin

-65.6%+73.4% pts

Net margin

-60.0%+83.4% pts

FCF margin

-46.7%+78.8% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$89.1M$89.1M$65.4M$45.2M$25.9M
Net Income$-53.4M$-53.4M$-40.5M$-29.5M$-37.2M
EBITDA$-50.2M$-50.2M$-37.3M$-26.5M$-35.1M
EPS——-3.39-1.26-1.59
Gross Margin87.9%87.9%86.7%84.4%82.9%
Operating Margin-65.6%-65.6%-60.7%-66.4%-139.0%
Net Margin-60.0%-60.0%-61.8%-65.1%-143.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.140.140.11-0.13-0.21
Current Ratio10.4410.44———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-41.6M$-41.6M$-36.4M$-30.1M$-32.5M
Returns
ROE-34.4%-34.4%-21.2%26.2%43.0%
Valuation
P/B4.274.271.52——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth36.1%36.1%44.7%74.5%—
EPS Growth——-168.4%20.7%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +3.0%

Total return

+3.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-3.39 → n/d

Residual

+3.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+3.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.