StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
CEQ.V$0.13+8.33%
Fair $0.13+0.0%

CEQ.V

Criterium Energy Ltd.

Energy / Oil & Gas E&PTSXV

$0.13

+0.01 (+8.33%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.13Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 45/C
F-Score: 5/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 20%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-2.7M · quality 53.0/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 16/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

45/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. ROE is 1.1%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · CEQ.VLocal privado en este navegador · Criterium Energy Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$18M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

20.1x

↑

ROE

106.1%

↑

Gross Margin

62.0%

↑

Debt/Equity

-2.00

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

CEQ.V price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.130Periodo -35.0%
Fair value: $0.130

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+464.6%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

6.6%

FCF / Net income

-0.15x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $33.8M · net income $-14.8M · FCF $2.2M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

62.0%-33.2% pts

Operating margin

3.9%+696.9% pts

Net margin

-43.8%+660.6% pts

FCF margin

6.6%+1611.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$33.8M$33.8M$29.9M$106000.00$187838.00
Net Income$-14.8M$-14.8M$-9.9M$-3.8M$-1.3M
EBITDA$2.2M$2.2M$5.1M$-3.8M$-1.3M
EPS——-0.08-0.10-0.08
Gross Margin62.0%62.0%59.4%66.0%95.2%
Operating Margin3.9%3.9%-4.2%-3027.4%-693.0%
Net Margin-43.8%-43.8%-33.1%-3593.4%-704.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-2.00-2.0040.290.130.04
Current Ratio0.110.11———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$2.2M$2.2M$-6.5M$-2.7M$-3.0M
Returns
ROE106.1%106.1%-1186.0%-377.1%-33.0%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA20.0620.067.94——
P/B——11.054.861.01
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth12.9%12.9%28153.8%-43.6%—
EPS Growth——20.0%-25.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +85.7%

Total return

+85.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.08 → n/d

Residual

+85.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+85.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.