StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
CGX.TO$11.36+3.93%
Fair $11.36+0.0%

CGX.TO

Cineplex Inc.

Communication Services / EntertainmentToronto

$11.36

+0.43 (+3.93%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $11.36Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 32/D
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $92.2M · quality 66.7/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 55/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

32/100

D

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · CGX.TOLocal privado en este navegador · Cineplex Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$721M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

9.5x

↑

ROE

46.8%

↑

Gross Margin

66.4%

↑

Debt/Equity

-22.56

↓
52-Week Range$11
$9$13

TradingView lightweight chart

CGX.TO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $11.36Periodo -45.3%
Fair value: $11.36

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+5.2%

FCF CAGR

+29.7%

FCF margin

7.2%

FCF / Net income

-2.48x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.28B · net income $-37.2M · FCF $92.2M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

66.4%+0.7% pts

Operating margin

7.4%+3.8% pts

Net margin

-2.9%-2.9% pts

FCF margin

7.2%+3.3% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$1.28B$1.28B$1.27B$1.39B$1.10B
Net Income$-37.2M$-37.2M$-37.7M$167.2M$113000.00
EBITDA$251.8M$251.8M$171.8M$322.0M$294.7M
EPS-0.58-0.58-0.592.12—
Gross Margin66.4%66.4%66.3%66.7%65.7%
Operating Margin7.4%7.4%6.9%10.7%3.6%
Net Margin-2.9%-2.9%-3.0%12.0%0.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-22.56-22.56-46.24-48.08-9.09
Current Ratio0.370.37———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$92.2M$92.2M$80.8M$145.7M$42.2M
Returns
ROE46.8%46.8%94.9%-423.9%-0.1%
Valuation
P/E———3.90—
EV/EBITDA9.459.4514.718.158.10
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth0.8%0.8%-8.2%25.9%—
EPS Growth1.7%1.7%-127.8%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -3.6%

Total return

-3.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.59 → -0.58

Residual

-3.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-3.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.