StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
CHLLTD.BO$31.61+1.25%
Fair $31.61+0.0%

CHLLTD.BO

CHL Limited

Consumer Cyclical / LodgingBSE

$31.61

+0.39 (+1.25%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $31.61Fund rank 36/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 27/D
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $430.3M · quality 69.7/100

Data gap 36/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 76/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

27/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 0.1%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · CHLLTD.BOLocal privado en este navegador · CHL Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.7B

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

10.1x

↑

ROE

0.1%

↓

Gross Margin

61.2%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.62

↑
52-Week Range$32
$27$45

TradingView lightweight chart

CHLLTD.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $31.61Periodo -25.7%
Fair value: $31.61

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+4.6%

FCF CAGR

-4.2%

FCF margin

30.9%

FCF / Net income

102.41x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.39B · net income $4.2M · FCF $430.3M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

61.2%-7.8% pts

Operating margin

0.9%-16.1% pts

Net margin

0.3%-2.2% pts

FCF margin

30.9%-9.3% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$1.39B$1.39B$1.38B$1.35B$1.22B
Net Income$4.2M$4.2M$-17.1M$140.6M$30.3M
EBITDA$423.5M$423.5M$443.2M$598.3M$345.9M
EPS——-1.241.146.08
Gross Margin61.2%61.2%64.9%68.0%69.0%
Operating Margin0.9%0.9%13.2%17.8%17.0%
Net Margin0.3%0.3%-1.2%10.4%2.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.620.62-3.35-3.65-3.69
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$430.3M$430.3M$533.7M$61.0M$488.7M
Returns
ROE0.1%0.1%2.2%-19.9%-3.9%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA10.1410.149.36——
P/B0.410.41———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth0.8%0.8%2.5%10.8%—
EPS Growth——-208.8%-81.3%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +5.0%

Total return

+5.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-1.24 → n/d

Residual

+5.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+5.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.