StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
CLIK$2.03+6.28%
Fair $2.03+0.0%

CLIK

Click Holdings Limited

Consumer Cyclical / Personal ServicesNasdaqCM

$2.03

+0.12 (+6.28%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $2.03Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 25/D
F-Score: 1/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-1.6M · quality 49.7/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 17/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

25/100

D

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists. ROE is -7.8%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · CLIKLocal privado en este navegador · Click Holdings Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$7M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-7.8%

↓

Gross Margin

15.3%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.06

↓
52-Week Range$2
$1$18

TradingView lightweight chart

CLIK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $2.030Periodo -97.4%
Fair value: $2.030

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+37.0%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-7.9%

FCF / Net income

0.83x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $83.5M · net income $-7.9M · FCF $-6.6M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

15.3%-3.9% pts

Operating margin

-10.2%-14.7% pts

Net margin

-9.5%-13.9% pts

FCF margin

-7.9%+4.5% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$83.5M$83.5M$8.0M$44.2M$32.5M
Net Income$-7.9M$-7.9M$935799.00$6.3M$1.4M
EBITDA$-7.0M$-7.0M$1.1M$7.4M$1.7M
EPS-376.50-376.50—12.632.88
Gross Margin15.3%15.3%23.6%30.1%19.2%
Operating Margin-10.2%-10.2%11.9%16.3%4.5%
Net Margin-9.5%-9.5%11.7%14.2%4.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.060.06—1.56-11.84
Current Ratio3.263.26———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-6.6M$-6.6M—$3.3M$-4.0M
Returns
ROE-7.8%-7.8%—199.0%-228.4%
Valuation
P/B0.000.00———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth945.2%945.2%-81.9%36.1%—
EPS Growth———338.9%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -86.2%

Total return

-86.2%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

n/d → -376.50

Residual

-86.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-86.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.