StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
CLIP.V$0.17+0.00%
Fair $0.17+0.0%

CLIP.V

Clip Money Inc.

Technology / Software - InfrastructureTSXV

$0.17

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.17Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 35/D
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-5.6M · quality 50.0/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 14/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

35/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · CLIP.VLocal privado en este navegador · Clip Money Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$19M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

56.6%

↑

Gross Margin

8.4%

↓

Debt/Equity

-1.40

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

CLIP.V price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.170Periodo -83.0%
Fair value: $0.170

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+492.0%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-76.3%

FCF / Net income

0.48x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $5.7M · net income $-9.1M · FCF $-4.4M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

8.4%+4495.0% pts

Operating margin

-119.6%+28682.4% pts

Net margin

-158.0%+43674.2% pts

FCF margin

-76.3%+23556.3% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$5.7M$5.7M$2.4M$577919.00$27687.00
Net Income$-9.1M$-9.1M$-9.3M$-9.3M$-12.1M
EBITDA$-4.0M$-4.0M$-5.3M$-6.5M$-9.6M
EPS——-0.09-0.11-0.22
Gross Margin8.4%8.4%-46.2%-335.4%-4486.5%
Operating Margin-119.6%-119.6%-329.5%-1438.8%-28802.0%
Net Margin-158.0%-158.0%-395.7%-1612.1%-43832.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-1.40-1.40-1.9813.923.02
Current Ratio0.470.47———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-4.4M$-4.4M$-5.6M$-7.3M$-6.5M
Returns
ROE56.6%56.6%117.7%-1098.4%-588.8%
Valuation
P/B———28.5311.33
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth143.3%143.3%308.4%1987.3%—
EPS Growth——18.2%50.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -8.1%

Total return

-8.1%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.09 → n/d

Residual

-8.1%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-8.1%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.