StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
CMPI.L$131.50+0.00%
Fair $131.50+0.0%

CMPI.L

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Ord

Unknown / UnknownLSE

$131.50

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $131.50Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 33/D
F-Score: 2/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $3.1M · quality 45.7/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 39/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

33/100

D

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 3.0%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · CMPI.LLocal privado en este navegador · CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Ord
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$125M

P/E

7.7x

↓

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

3.0%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.05

↓
52-Week Range$132
$110$135

TradingView lightweight chart

CMPI.L price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $131.00Periodo +31.7%
Fair value: $131.50

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

+28.3%

FCF margin

56.8%

FCF / Net income

0.66x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $5.3M · net income $4.6M · FCF $3.0M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

86.0%-19.8% pts

FCF margin

56.8%+68.1% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$5.3M$5.3M$15.1M$-9.9M$-12.6M
Net Income$4.6M$4.6M$14.4M$-10.6M$-13.4M
EPS0.050.050.08-0.10-0.02
Net Margin86.0%86.0%95.6%107.0%105.8%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.050.050.050.050.04
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$3.0M$3.0M$3.1M$3.2M$1.4M
Returns
ROE3.0%3.0%9.4%-7.3%-8.4%
Valuation
P/E7.747.741529.56——
P/B75.5275.5268.5871.9570.54
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-64.6%-64.6%251.5%21.3%—
EPS Growth-42.0%-42.0%176.3%-385.7%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

537.2%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$11.67

Spread vs growth

-579.2%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

215.6%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$14.12

Spread vs growth

-257.6%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

86.3%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$22.74

Spread vs growth

-128.4%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +13.4%

Total return

+13.4%

Start / end P/E

1484.6x → 2904.7x

EPS bridge

0.08 → 0.05

Residual

-40.2%

EPS growth-42.0%
Multiple rerating+95.7%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-40.2%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.