StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
CPKR.TO$19.08-0.52%
Fair $19.08+0.0%

CPKR.TO

CPKR.TO

Consumer Defensive / Farm ProductsToronto

$19.08

-0.10 (-0.52%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $19.08Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 45/C
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 26% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $163.1M · quality 54.0/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 62/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

45/100

C

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

8/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 2Warnings: 0unknown: 2
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Limited financial history; valuation confidence should be treated as provisional. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · CPKR.TOLocal privado en este navegador · CPKR.TO
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$568M

P/E

4.9x

↓

EV/EBITDA

4.8x

↓

ROE

39.1%

↑

Gross Margin

13.8%

↓

Debt/Equity

1.78

↑
52-Week Range$19
$14$24

TradingView lightweight chart

CPKR.TO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $19.08Periodo +11.3%
Fair value: $19.08

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2024–2025 · 1 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+10.7%

FCF CAGR

+78.1%

FCF margin

11.4%

FCF / Net income

1.96x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.84B · net income $106.3M · FCF $208.9M

2024-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

13.8%-0.2% pts

Operating margin

9.4%-0.6% pts

Net margin

5.8%-0.7% pts

FCF margin

11.4%+4.3% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
Income Statement
Revenue$1.84B$1.84B$1.66B
Net Income$106.3M$106.3M$108.3M
EBITDA$207.6M$207.6M$202.8M
EPS3.583.583.64
Gross Margin13.8%13.8%13.9%
Operating Margin9.4%9.4%10.0%
Net Margin5.8%5.8%6.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.781.780.16
Current Ratio3.003.00—
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$208.9M$208.9M$117.3M
Returns
ROE39.1%39.1%19.2%
Valuation
P/E4.894.89—
EV/EBITDA4.804.80—
P/B2.082.08—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth10.7%10.7%—
EPS Growth-1.7%-1.7%—
Dividend Yield4.8%4.8%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-22.1%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$1.69

Spread vs growth

20.4%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

-10.6%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$2.05

Spread vs growth

8.9%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

-0.8%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$3.30

Spread vs growth

-0.8%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total +16.1%

Total return

+16.1%

Start / end P/E

4.7x → 5.3x

EPS bridge

3.64 → 3.58

Residual

-0.2%

EPS growth-1.7%
Multiple rerating+13.1%
Dividend+4.8%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-0.2%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.