StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
CPX.L$0.28-9.68%
Fair $0.28+0.0%

CPX.L

CAP-XX Limited

Technology / Electronic ComponentsLSE

$0.28

-0.03 (-9.68%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.28Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 32/D
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 24%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-4.1M · quality 72.3/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 37/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

32/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -58.6%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · CPX.LLocal privado en este navegador · CAP-XX Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$16M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-58.6%

↓

Gross Margin

29.7%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.26

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

CPX.L price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.280Periodo -99.7%
Fair value: $0.280

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-3.9%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-51.5%

FCF / Net income

0.65x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $4.9M · net income $-3.9M · FCF $-2.5M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

29.7%-15.7% pts

Operating margin

-84.0%+3.2% pts

Net margin

-79.5%+9.4% pts

FCF margin

-51.5%-1.9% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$4.9M$4.9M$4.6M$3.6M$5.6M
Net Income$-3.9M$-3.9M$-6.1M$-5.6M$-4.9M
EBITDA$-3.7M$-3.7M$-5.8M$-4.5M$-4.6M
EPS-0.00-0.00-0.01-0.01-0.01
Gross Margin29.7%29.7%30.0%43.3%45.4%
Operating Margin-84.0%-84.0%-127.2%-147.4%-87.2%
Net Margin-79.5%-79.5%-133.7%-153.1%-88.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.260.260.620.500.35
Current Ratio3.623.62———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-2.5M$-2.5M$-4.1M$-4.5M$-2.8M
Returns
ROE-58.6%-58.6%-138.0%-85.1%-72.2%
Valuation
P/B199.55199.5558.25115.37286.41
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth7.5%7.5%26.5%-34.6%—
EPS Growth85.2%85.2%50.9%-10.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +80.6%

Total return

+80.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.01 → -0.00

Residual

+80.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+80.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.