StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
CSRA.JK$805.00-3.59%
Fair $805.00+0.0%

CSRA.JK

PT Cisadane Sawit Raya Tbk

Consumer Defensive / Farm ProductsJakarta

$805.00

-30.00 (-3.59%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $805.00Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 52/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 26% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $90.7B · quality 61.0/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 52/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

52/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

8/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 2Warnings: 0unknown: 2
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Limited financial history; valuation confidence should be treated as provisional. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · CSRA.JKLocal privado en este navegador · PT Cisadane Sawit Raya Tbk
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.65T

P/E

5.9x

↓

EV/EBITDA

5.3x

↓

ROE

18.3%

↑

Gross Margin

34.8%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.52

↑
52-Week Range$805
$615$1085

TradingView lightweight chart

CSRA.JK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $805.00Periodo +279.7%
Fair value: $805.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2024–2025 · 1 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+77.1%

FCF CAGR

+355.8%

FCF margin

7.9%

FCF / Net income

0.55x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.89T · net income $268.78B · FCF $148.70B

2024-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

34.8%-10.6% pts

Operating margin

22.0%-10.0% pts

Net margin

14.2%-5.9% pts

FCF margin

7.9%+4.8% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
Income Statement
Revenue$1889.27B$1889.27B$1066.76B
Net Income$268.78B$268.78B$214.85B
EBITDA$422.32B$422.32B$346.68B
EPS——105.00
Gross Margin34.8%34.8%45.4%
Operating Margin22.0%22.0%32.0%
Net Margin14.2%14.2%20.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.520.520.53
Current Ratio1.481.48—
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$148.70B$148.70B$32.63B
Returns
ROE18.3%18.3%16.5%
Valuation
P/E5.885.886.86
EV/EBITDA5.345.345.87
P/B1.131.131.14
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth77.1%77.1%—
Dividend Yield1.5%1.5%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +24.4%

Total return

+24.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

105.00 → n/d

Residual

+22.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+1.5%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+22.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.