StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
CULT.MI$19.10+0.00%
Fair $19.10+0.0%

CULT.MI

CULTI Milano S.p.A.

Consumer Cyclical / Luxury GoodsMilan

$19.10

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $19.10Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 48/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 22%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $1.8M · quality 54.0/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 31/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

48/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · CULT.MILocal privado en este navegador · CULTI Milano S.p.A.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$52M

P/E

83.0x

↑

EV/EBITDA

22.4x

↑

ROE

5.1%

↑

Gross Margin

80.7%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.05

↓
52-Week Range$19
$11$19

TradingView lightweight chart

CULT.MI price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $19.10Periodo +270.9%
Fair value: $19.10

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-1.5%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

6.5%

FCF / Net income

2.29x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $22.1M · net income $624921.0 · FCF $1.4M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

80.7%+5.6% pts

Operating margin

7.0%-7.8% pts

Net margin

2.8%-6.2% pts

FCF margin

6.5%+10.1% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$22.1M$22.1M$24.8M$22.6M$23.1M
Net Income$624921.00$624921.00$4.0M$1.4M$2.1M
EBITDA$2.2M$2.2M$6.7M$3.2M$4.3M
EPS——1.470.510.76
Gross Margin80.7%80.7%78.6%76.9%75.1%
Operating Margin7.0%7.0%17.1%8.9%14.9%
Net Margin2.8%2.8%16.2%6.1%9.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.050.050.220.901.49
Current Ratio3.033.03———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$1.4M$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$-839833.00
Returns
ROE5.1%5.1%33.5%17.0%28.7%
Valuation
P/E83.0483.049.6135.8533.21
EV/EBITDA22.3822.385.6816.7216.43
P/B4.244.243.226.089.52
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-10.9%-10.9%9.4%-2.1%—
EPS Growth——187.3%-33.0%—
Dividend Yield0.5%0.5%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +23.8%

Total return

+23.8%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

1.47 → n/d

Residual

+23.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.5%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+23.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.