StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
DVNO.L$76.50+0.00%
Fair $76.50+0.0%

DVNO.L

Develop North Ord

Unknown / UnknownLSE

$76.50

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $76.50Fund rank 37/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 25/D
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $998000.00 · quality 74.7/100

Data gap 37/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 81/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

25/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 2.1%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · DVNO.LLocal privado en este navegador · Develop North Ord
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$20M

P/E

38.3x

↑

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

2.1%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.35

↑
52-Week Range$77
$1$86

TradingView lightweight chart

DVNO.L price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $76.50Periodo -26.1%
Fair value: $76.50

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+8.0%

FCF CAGR

+9.5%

FCF margin

71.6%

FCF / Net income

2.27x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.3M · net income $415000.0 · FCF $942000.0

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

31.6%-17.6% pts

FCF margin

71.6%+2.9% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$1.3M$1.3M$1.5M$724000.00$1.0M
Net Income$415000.00$415000.00$1.2M$261000.00$514000.00
EPS0.020.020.050.010.02
Net Margin31.6%31.6%77.5%36.0%49.2%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.350.350.11—0.18
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$942000.00$942000.00$1.1M$998000.00$718000.00
Returns
ROE2.1%2.1%5.9%1.3%2.3%
Valuation
P/E38.2538.251681.038247.424526.32
P/B98.7498.7498.78103.97105.15
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-12.9%-12.9%108.6%-30.7%—
EPS Growth-64.2%-64.2%378.4%-48.9%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

642.2%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$6.79

Spread vs growth

-706.5%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

245.8%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$8.21

Spread vs growth

-310.1%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

95.0%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$13.23

Spread vs growth

-159.3%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -1.9%

Total return

-1.9%

Start / end P/E

1681.0x → 4608.4x

EPS bridge

0.05 → 0.02

Residual

-111.8%

EPS growth-64.2%
Multiple rerating+174.1%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-111.8%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.