StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
DXST$1.60+2.56%
Fair $1.60+0.0%

DXST

Decent Holding Inc.

Industrials / Waste ManagementNasdaqCM

$1.60

+0.04 (+2.56%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.60Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 26/D
F-Score: 0/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 20%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-440455.00 · quality 55.3/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 28/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

26/100

D

Piotroski

0/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists. ROE is -4.2%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · DXSTLocal privado en este navegador · Decent Holding Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$3M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-4.2%

↓

Gross Margin

26.2%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.01

↓
52-Week Range$2
$2$62

TradingView lightweight chart

DXST price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.600Periodo -98.4%
Fair value: $1.600

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+53.3%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-26.7%

FCF / Net income

10.73x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $12.9M · net income $-322202.0 · FCF $-3.5M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

26.2%-19.9% pts

Operating margin

-1.1%-14.9% pts

Net margin

-2.5%-12.9% pts

FCF margin

-26.7%-58.1% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$12.9M$12.9M$11.5M$9.4M$3.6M
Net Income$-322202.00$-322202.00$2.1M$1.9M$372435.00
EBITDA$-35312.00$-35312.00$2.6M$2.2M$538918.00
EPS——3.242.860.57
Gross Margin26.2%26.2%27.8%34.0%46.0%
Operating Margin-1.1%-1.1%21.7%23.0%13.9%
Net Margin-2.5%-2.5%18.2%19.7%10.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.010.010.010.041.92
Current Ratio1.711.71———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-3.5M$-3.5M$-440455.00$1.4M$1.1M
Returns
ROE-4.2%-4.2%41.9%66.1%36.4%
Valuation
P/B0.130.13———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth12.2%12.2%22.2%162.9%—
EPS Growth——13.1%399.3%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -95.2%

Total return

-95.2%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

3.24 → n/d

Residual

-95.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-95.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.