StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ECOHOTELS.BO$15.38+3.57%
Fair $15.38+0.0%

ECOHOTELS.BO

Eco Hotels and Resorts Ltd

Consumer Cyclical / LodgingBSE

$15.38

+0.53 (+3.57%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $15.38Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 12/F
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-67.5M · quality 45.7/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 19/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

12/100

F

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -32.7%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · ECOHOTELS.BOLocal privado en este navegador · Eco Hotels and Resorts Ltd
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.0B

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-32.7%

↓

Gross Margin

-46.5%

↓

Debt/Equity

1.12

↑
52-Week Range$15
$9$21

TradingView lightweight chart

ECOHOTELS.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $15.38Periodo +554.5%
Fair value: $15.38

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-139.1%

FCF / Net income

0.63x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $48.5M · net income $-107.3M · FCF $-67.5M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

-46.5%— pts

Operating margin

-199.5%— pts

Net margin

-221.2%— pts

FCF margin

-139.1%— pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$48.5M$48.5M$1.7M$1.8M—
Net Income$-107.3M$-107.3M$-35.2M$-56.1M—
EBITDA$-72.9M$-72.9M$-25.5M$-43.6M—
EPS——-0.77-3.23—
Gross Margin-46.5%-46.5%-616.6%100.0%—
Operating Margin-199.5%-199.5%-2312.4%-2648.6%—
Net Margin-221.2%-221.2%-2122.6%-3117.7%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.121.120.030.00-0.18
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-67.5M$-67.5M$-231.7M$-56.4M—
Returns
ROE-32.7%-32.7%-10.3%-27.1%—
Valuation
P/B3.073.072.272.87—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth2829.8%2829.8%-8.0%——
EPS Growth——76.2%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -2.6%

Total return

-2.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.77 → n/d

Residual

-2.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-2.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.