StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
EDY.V$1.50+0.00%
Fair $1.50+0.0%

EDY.V

Eddy Smart Home Solutions Ltd.

Technology / Scientific & Technical InstrumentsTSXV

$1.50

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.50Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 25/D
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-1.9M · quality 48.3/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 12/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

25/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · EDY.VLocal privado en este navegador · Eddy Smart Home Solutions Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$9M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

59.5%

↑

Gross Margin

61.1%

↑

Debt/Equity

-0.23

↓
52-Week Range$2
$1$3

TradingView lightweight chart

EDY.V price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.500Periodo -97.5%
Fair value: $1.500

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+22.5%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-15.8%

FCF / Net income

0.27x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $4.7M · net income $-2.8M · FCF $-746139.0

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

61.1%+4.9% pts

Operating margin

-80.0%+325.8% pts

Net margin

-59.6%+400.6% pts

FCF margin

-15.8%+392.8% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$4.7M$4.7M$3.8M$3.4M$2.6M
Net Income$-2.8M$-2.8M$-3.6M$-10.6M$-11.8M
EBITDA$-2.4M$-2.4M$-2.9M$-9.0M$-11.2M
EPS——-1.04-13.29-16.00
Gross Margin61.1%61.1%53.5%42.2%56.2%
Operating Margin-80.0%-80.0%-83.1%-188.7%-405.8%
Net Margin-59.6%-59.6%-96.5%-310.0%-460.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-0.23-0.23—-0.980.76
Current Ratio0.770.77———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-746139.00$-746139.00$-1.9M$-2.4M$-10.5M
Returns
ROE59.5%59.5%159.0%161.1%-299.5%
Valuation
P/B————1.88
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth24.9%24.9%10.8%33.0%—
EPS Growth——92.2%16.9%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -21.5%

Total return

-21.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-1.04 → n/d

Residual

-21.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-21.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.