StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ELAB$1.77+0.00%
Fair $1.77+0.0%

ELAB

PMGC Holdings Inc.

Healthcare / BiotechnologyNasdaqCM

$1.77

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.77Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 11/F
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 23%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-6.0M · quality 65.7/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 34/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

11/100

F

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists. ROE is -98.9%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · ELABLocal privado en este navegador · PMGC Holdings Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$8M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-98.9%

↓

Gross Margin

31.4%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.34

↑
52-Week Range$2
$2$310

TradingView lightweight chart

ELAB price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.770Periodo -100.0%
Fair value: $1.770

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-8.3%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-1081.6%

FCF / Net income

0.82x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $590084.0 · net income $-7.7M · FCF $-6.4M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

31.4%-27.0% pts

Operating margin

-1156.0%-922.6% pts

Net margin

-1313.0%-1078.1% pts

FCF margin

-1081.6%-870.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$590084.00$590084.00——$766277.00
Net Income$-7.7M$-7.7M$-6.2M$-4.3M$-1.8M
EBITDA$-7.4M$-7.4M$-3.3M$-1.6M$-1.8M
EPS-380.99-380.99-1195.13-29262.02-12246.72
Gross Margin31.4%31.4%——58.4%
Operating Margin-1156.0%-1156.0%——-233.4%
Net Margin-1313.0%-1313.0%——-234.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.340.34—0.050.25
Current Ratio1.451.45———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-6.4M$-6.4M$-6.0M$-4.6M$-1.6M
Returns
ROE-98.9%-98.9%-93.8%-112.4%-159.1%
Valuation
P/B0.000.001.157.52—
Growth & Yield
EPS Growth68.1%68.1%95.9%-138.9%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -99.0%

Total return

-99.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-1195.13 → -380.99

Residual

-99.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-99.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.