StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ETS.MI$7.40+0.00%
Fair $7.40+0.0%

ETS.MI

E.T.S. S.P.A. Engineering and Technical Services

Industrials / Engineering & ConstructionMilan

$7.40

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $7.40Fund rank 34/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 60/B
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 25% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $2.0M · quality 67.3/100

Data gap 34/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 57/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

60/100

B

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

8/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 2Warnings: 0unknown: 2
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Limited financial history; valuation confidence should be treated as provisional. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · ETS.MILocal privado en este navegador · E.T.S. S.P.A. Engineering and Technical Services
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$36M

P/E

10.9x

↓

EV/EBITDA

7.3x

↓

ROE

55.3%

↑

Gross Margin

99.6%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.06

↓
52-Week Range$7
$5$8

TradingView lightweight chart

ETS.MI price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $7.400Periodo +24.4%
Fair value: $7.400

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2024 · 1 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+10.4%

FCF CAGR

+41.1%

FCF margin

15.5%

FCF / Net income

0.72x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $15.2M · net income $3.3M · FCF $2.4M

2023-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

99.6%-0.0% pts

Operating margin

28.1%+0.7% pts

Net margin

21.6%+1.8% pts

FCF margin

15.5%+3.4% pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$15.2M$15.2M$13.7M
Net Income$3.3M$3.3M$2.7M
EBITDA$4.7M$4.7M$4.0M
EPS——0.57
Gross Margin99.6%99.6%99.6%
Operating Margin28.1%28.1%27.4%
Net Margin21.6%21.6%19.8%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.060.060.09
Current Ratio3.523.52—
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$2.4M$2.4M$1.7M
Returns
ROE55.3%55.3%68.5%
Valuation
P/E10.8810.88—
EV/EBITDA7.267.26—
P/B5.985.98—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth10.4%10.4%—
Dividend Yield6.3%6.3%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total +30.7%

Total return

+30.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.57 → n/d

Residual

+24.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+6.3%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+24.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.