StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
EVGN$0.68-4.23%
Fair $0.68+0.0%

EVGN

Evogene Ltd.

Healthcare / BiotechnologyNasdaqCM

$0.68

-0.03 (-4.23%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.68Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 34/D
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 23%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-20.3M · quality 68.7/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 33/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

34/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific biotech pipeline model required: targets are disabled until product, probability, peak-sales and cash-runway data exists.
Thesis & Journal · EVGNLocal privado en este navegador · Evogene Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$7M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

10347.6%

↑

Gross Margin

-6.3%

↓

Debt/Equity

-26.80

↓
52-Week Range$1
$1$2

TradingView lightweight chart

EVGN price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.680Periodo -99.3%
Fair value: $0.683

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+32.0%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-353.9%

FCF / Net income

1.61x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $3.9M · net income $-8.5M · FCF $-13.6M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

-6.3%-52.0% pts

Operating margin

-364.2%+1244.2% pts

Net margin

-220.2%+1370.1% pts

FCF margin

-353.9%+1129.6% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$3.9M$3.9M$5.6M$3.0M$1.7M
Net Income$-8.5M$-8.5M$-16.5M$-23.9M$-26.6M
EBITDA$-12.2M$-12.2M$-13.4M$-20.5M$-27.0M
EPS-1.08-1.08-2.89-5.20-6.50
Gross Margin-6.3%-6.3%57.3%50.0%45.7%
Operating Margin-364.2%-364.2%-337.2%-745.5%-1608.4%
Net Margin-220.2%-220.2%-295.6%-800.8%-1590.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-26.80-26.80-8.870.950.43
Current Ratio2.792.79———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-13.6M$-13.6M$-20.3M$-22.2M$-24.8M
Returns
ROE10347.6%10347.6%1136.1%-198.1%-95.4%
Valuation
P/B———3.641.11
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-30.9%-30.9%87.0%78.0%—
EPS Growth62.6%62.6%44.4%20.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -37.6%

Total return

-37.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-2.89 → -1.08

Residual

-37.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-37.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.