StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
EVOK.L$40.50+5.74%
Fair $40.50+0.0%

EVOK.L

Evoke plc

Consumer Cyclical / GamblingLSE

$40.50

+2.20 (+5.74%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $40.50Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 32/D
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 32% · confianza 22%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $131.1M · quality 43.7/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 22/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

32/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · EVOK.LLocal privado en este navegador · Evoke plc
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$182M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

80.4%

↑

Gross Margin

66.3%

↑

Debt/Equity

-2.78

↓
52-Week Range$41
$20$76

TradingView lightweight chart

EVOK.L price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $40.50Periodo -76.2%
Fair value: $40.50

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+12.9%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

7.7%

FCF / Net income

-0.25x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.78B · net income $-547.5M · FCF $137.9M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

66.3%+1.8% pts

Operating margin

7.1%-0.3% pts

Net margin

-30.7%-21.0% pts

FCF margin

7.7%+16.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$1.78B$1.78B$1.75B$1.71B$1.24B
Net Income$-547.5M$-547.5M$-221.9M$-65.2M$-120.5M
EBITDA$-207.4M$-207.4M$215.2M$263.7M$82.5M
EPS-1.22-1.22-0.49-0.13-0.28
Gross Margin66.3%66.3%65.6%66.2%64.4%
Operating Margin7.1%7.1%4.6%4.4%7.4%
Net Margin-30.7%-30.7%-12.6%-3.8%-9.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-2.78-2.78-11.7630.4111.25
Current Ratio0.560.56———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$137.9M$137.9M$131.1M$81.1M$-107.0M
Returns
ROE80.4%80.4%142.3%-113.4%-75.7%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA——137.92154.01509.12
P/B———680.36254.58
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth1.6%1.6%2.5%38.1%—
EPS Growth-146.6%-146.6%-292.1%55.5%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -25.4%

Total return

-25.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.49 → -1.22

Residual

-25.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-25.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.