StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
EXATO.BO$330.00+0.67%
Fair $330.00+0.0%

EXATO.BO

Exato Technologies Limited

Technology / Software - InfrastructureBSE

$330.00

+2.20 (+0.67%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $330.00Fund rank 24/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 38/D
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 16%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $3.7M · quality 35.7/100

Data gap 24/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 18/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

38/100

D

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 0unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · EXATO.BOLocal privado en este navegador · Exato Technologies Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$3.3B

P/E

20.5x

↓

EV/EBITDA

20.7x

↑

ROE

23.0%

↑

Gross Margin

27.1%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.75

↑
52-Week Range$330
$266$475

TradingView lightweight chart

EXATO.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $330.00Periodo +18.2%
Fair value: $330.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2025 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+30.7%

FCF CAGR

-81.0%

FCF margin

0.3%

FCF / Net income

0.04x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.24B · net income $97.5M · FCF $3.7M

2023-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

27.1%+6.1% pts

Operating margin

12.8%+4.4% pts

Net margin

7.8%+0.9% pts

FCF margin

0.3%-13.7% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$1.24B$1.24B$1.14B$727.6M
Net Income$97.5M$97.5M$53.1M$50.6M
EBITDA$160.0M$160.0M$91.4M$61.3M
EPS9.699.695.275.02
Gross Margin27.1%27.1%21.6%21.0%
Operating Margin12.8%12.8%7.1%8.4%
Net Margin7.8%7.8%4.7%7.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.750.750.610.29
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$3.7M$3.7M$-198.1M$101.7M
Returns
ROE23.0%23.0%19.6%23.3%
Valuation
P/E20.4620.46——
EV/EBITDA20.7220.72——
P/B7.857.85——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth9.1%9.1%56.5%—
EPS Growth83.7%83.7%4.9%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

44.6%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$29.28

Spread vs growth

39.1%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

29.6%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$35.43

Spread vs growth

54.1%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

19.4%

exigente

EPS terminal req.

$57.06

Spread vs growth

64.3%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total +18.2%

Total return

+18.2%

Start / end P/E

53.0x → 34.1x

EPS bridge

5.27 → 9.69

Residual

-29.9%

EPS growth+83.7%
Multiple rerating-35.7%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-29.9%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.