StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
EZGO$1.68-0.59%
Fair $1.68+0.0%

EZGO

EZGO Technologies Ltd.

Consumer Cyclical / Recreational VehiclesNasdaqCM

$1.68

-0.01 (-0.59%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.68Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 20/D
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 24%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-14.1M · quality 71.0/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 36/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

20/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -18.0%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · EZGOLocal privado en este navegador · EZGO Technologies Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$4M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-18.0%

↓

Gross Margin

6.5%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.24

↓
52-Week Range$2
$1$2588

TradingView lightweight chart

EZGO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.680Periodo -100.0%
Fair value: $1.680

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+5.6%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-20.9%

FCF / Net income

0.49x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $20.5M · net income $-8.7M · FCF $-4.3M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

6.5%+5.3% pts

Operating margin

-9.5%+27.6% pts

Net margin

-42.4%-5.3% pts

FCF margin

-20.9%+48.8% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$20.5M$20.5M$18.2M$9.2M$17.4M
Net Income$-8.7M$-8.7M$-7.3M$-6.8M$-6.5M
EBITDA$-7.6M$-7.6M$-5.9M$-3.4M$-5.6M
EPS——-69.88-147.84-473.00
Gross Margin6.5%6.5%9.3%11.3%1.3%
Operating Margin-9.5%-9.5%-12.8%-34.8%-37.2%
Net Margin-42.4%-42.4%-40.0%-74.0%-37.2%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.240.240.250.100.09
Current Ratio3.213.21———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-4.3M$-4.3M$-14.4M$-14.1M$-12.1M
Returns
ROE-18.0%-18.0%-12.4%-10.7%-21.1%
Valuation
P/B0.030.039.2816.0729.50
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth12.4%12.4%98.9%-47.3%—
EPS Growth——52.7%68.7%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -99.9%

Total return

-99.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-69.88 → n/d

Residual

-99.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-99.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.