StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
FAB.WA$28.40+1.43%
Fair $28.40+0.0%

FAB.WA

Fabrity S.A.

Technology / Software - ApplicationWarsaw

$28.40

+0.40 (+1.43%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $28.40Fund rank 35/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 59/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $7.7M · quality 73.3/100

Data gap 35/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 66/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

59/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · FAB.WALocal privado en este navegador · Fabrity S.A.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$79M

P/E

20.0x

↓

EV/EBITDA

9.9x

↓

ROE

13.7%

↑

Gross Margin

26.6%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.05

↓
52-Week Range$28
$23$30

TradingView lightweight chart

FAB.WA price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $28.40Periodo +26.2%
Fair value: $28.40

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+7.9%

FCF CAGR

+42.6%

FCF margin

11.5%

FCF / Net income

2.02x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $67.1M · net income $3.8M · FCF $7.7M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

26.6%+8.5% pts

Operating margin

6.3%-2.9% pts

Net margin

5.7%-39.7% pts

FCF margin

11.5%+6.5% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$67.1M$67.1M$74.7M$68.7M$53.4M
Net Income$3.8M$3.8M$7.2M$12.9M$24.2M
EBITDA$6.8M$6.8M$7.2M$18.0M$32.1M
EPS——3.095.719.82
Gross Margin26.6%26.6%27.8%85.9%18.1%
Operating Margin6.3%6.3%9.3%9.5%9.3%
Net Margin5.7%5.7%9.7%18.8%45.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.050.050.130.070.13
Current Ratio4.494.49———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$7.7M$7.7M$9.9M$4.0M$2.7M
Returns
ROE13.7%13.7%27.7%35.1%71.7%
Valuation
P/E20.0020.009.666.483.12
EV/EBITDA9.889.888.023.802.08
P/B2.842.842.672.462.23
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-10.2%-10.2%8.7%28.7%—
EPS Growth——-45.8%-41.9%—
Dividend Yield8.9%8.9%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +9.6%

Total return

+9.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

3.09 → n/d

Residual

+0.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+8.9%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+0.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.