Consumer Cyclical / Auto ManufacturersNasdaqCM
$5.05
+0.07 (+1.39%)
FCF base 3Y
n/d
n/d CAGR · yield n/d
FCF base 5Y
n/d
n/d base · n/d expected
Precio de entrada
n/d
MOS 33% · confianza 25%
FCF escenarios
weak_data · normalized FCF $-13.5M · quality 52.0/100
Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.
SA Score
28/100
D
Piotroski
3/9
balance/quality
Valuation
50/100
+0.0% upside
5Y CAGR
+0.0%
50/100
Data QA
20/100
SEC 0%
Sin guardar todavía.
Market Cap
$25M
P/E
N/A
•EV/EBITDA
N/A
•ROE
-217.1%
↓Gross Margin
N/A
•Debt/Equity
0.03
↓TradingView lightweight chart
Absolute Values (Left Axis)
Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)
Financial statement dashboard
2011–2025 · 14 años de histórico normalizado
Revenue CAGR
—
FCF CAGR
—
FCF margin
—
FCF / Net income
0.36x
Latest source
Provider fallback
Margin decomposition
Último año: revenue — · net income $-21.1M · FCF $-7.7M
Gross margin
Operating margin
Net margin
FCF margin
| Metric | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income Statement | ||||||||||||||||
| Revenue | — | — | $63777.00 | $498917.00 | $3.0M | $2.7M | $1.6M | $890152.00 | $6.1M | $4.3M | $14.6M | $24.4M | $15.8M | $24.8M | $65.5M | $84.1M |
| Net Income | $-21.1M | $-21.1M | $-1.8M | $-34.2M | $-22.9M | $-33.1M | $-10.8M | $-8.7M | $-18.7M | $-7.6M | $-2.8M | $-8.8M | $-11.1M | $-6.9M | $-20.5M | $-36.8M |
| EBITDA | $-10.2M | $-10.2M | $-15.8M | $-26.9M | $-22.3M | $-32.6M | $-9.7M | $-7.8M | $-1.9M | $-6.1M | $-4.0M | $-1.0M | $-3.8M | $1.2M | $-11.7M | $-35.5M |
| EPS | -32.24 | -32.24 | -32.25 | -131.04 | -79.20 | -120.32 | — | -896.00 | -9529.60 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — | -10328.5% | -929.0% | -102.1% | -77.9% | -10.4% | 22.3% | -29.4% | -6.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | -27779.9% | -5643.5% | -778.4% | -1234.5% | -630.0% | -954.3% | -36.7% | -147.3% | -27.7% | -4.4% | -25.0% | -1.1% | -21.4% | -45.5% |
| Net Margin | — | — | -2752.5% | -6846.9% | -766.9% | -1232.7% | -671.0% | -973.4% | -308.5% | -178.3% | -19.1% | -36.1% | -70.2% | -27.9% | -31.4% | -43.8% |
| Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||
| Debt/Equity | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.02 | — | 0.00 | 4.61 | — | — | 0.04 | — | — | 0.00 | — | — |
| Current Ratio | 5.05 | 5.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Cash Flow | ||||||||||||||||
| Free Cash Flow | $-7.7M | $-7.7M | $-13.5M | $-28.4M | $-20.4M | $-27.2M | $-10.5M | $-4.6M | $-10.5M | $-4.2M | $-2.8M | $-917321.00 | $-1.5M | — | — | — |
| Returns | ||||||||||||||||
| ROE | -217.1% | -217.1% | -14.3% | -134.9% | -44.1% | -45.1% | -27.3% | -12567.9% | -17298.5% | 170.2% | -125.1% | 1260.0% | -215.9% | 389.0% | -431.0% | -145.0% |
| Valuation | ||||||||||||||||
| P/B | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.37 | 0.35 | 0.38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Growth & Yield | ||||||||||||||||
| Revenue Growth | — | — | -87.2% | -83.3% | — | 67.3% | 80.2% | -85.4% | 41.8% | -70.6% | -40.4% | 55.0% | -36.4% | -62.2% | -22.2% | — |
| EPS Growth | 0.0% | 0.0% | 75.4% | -65.5% | — | — | — | 90.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)
Margins (%)
Returns (%)
Leverage & Liquidity
Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.
Total return
-17.9%
Start / end P/E
n/dx → n/dx
EPS bridge
-32.25 → -32.24
Residual
-17.9%
EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.
Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.