StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
FABLE.ST$5.22-3.69%
Fair $5.22+0.0%

FABLE.ST

FABLE.ST

Consumer Cyclical / GamblingStockholm

$5.22

-0.20 (-3.69%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $5.22Fund rank 37/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 49/C
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $39.7M · quality 78.3/100

Data gap 37/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 84/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

49/100

C

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · FABLE.STLocal privado en este navegador · FABLE.ST
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$177M

P/E

6.5x

↓

EV/EBITDA

4.8x

↓

ROE

28.7%

↑

Gross Margin

83.6%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.53

↑
52-Week Range$5
$4$8

TradingView lightweight chart

FABLE.ST price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $5.220Periodo -98.8%
Fair value: $5.220

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+2.1%

FCF CAGR

-10.2%

FCF margin

29.9%

FCF / Net income

0.61x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $65.5M · net income $31.9M · FCF $19.6M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

83.6%+11.7% pts

Operating margin

66.9%+15.5% pts

Net margin

48.7%+12.8% pts

FCF margin

29.9%-14.1% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$65.5M$65.5M$94.3M$83.5M$61.5M
Net Income$31.9M$31.9M$33.5M$31.1M$22.1M
EBITDA$48.5M$48.5M$53.3M$48.7M$35.3M
EPS——0.990.920.85
Gross Margin83.6%83.6%85.2%76.2%71.9%
Operating Margin66.9%66.9%66.8%53.9%51.4%
Net Margin48.7%48.7%35.5%37.3%35.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.530.530.681.224.39
Current Ratio1.671.67———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$19.6M$19.6M$51.9M$39.7M$27.0M
Returns
ROE28.7%28.7%37.4%55.4%88.1%
Valuation
P/E6.526.525.966.527.91
EV/EBITDA4.764.764.815.507.60
P/B1.591.592.243.637.00
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-30.6%-30.6%13.0%35.7%—
EPS Growth——7.6%8.2%—
Dividend Yield12.0%12.0%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +12.8%

Total return

+12.8%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.99 → n/d

Residual

+0.8%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+12.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+0.8%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.