StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
FATN$6.87-13.69%
Fair $6.87+0.0%

FATN

FatPipe, Inc.

Technology / Software - InfrastructureNasdaqCM

$6.87

-1.09 (-13.69%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $6.87Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 55/C
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 20%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-523886.00 · quality 54.7/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 23/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

55/100

C

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · FATNLocal privado en este navegador · FatPipe, Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$96M

P/E

19.6x

↓

EV/EBITDA

22.2x

↑

ROE

19.7%

↑

Gross Margin

91.0%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.23

↑
52-Week Range$7
$1$11

TradingView lightweight chart

FATN price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $6.870Periodo -47.2%
Fair value: $6.870

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+6.7%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-4.3%

FCF / Net income

-0.17x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $19.2M · net income $5.0M · FCF $-832876.0

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

91.0%-2.0% pts

Operating margin

18.7%-1.8% pts

Net margin

25.9%+7.4% pts

FCF margin

-4.3%+8.4% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$19.2M$19.2M$16.3M$17.9M$15.8M
Net Income$5.0M$5.0M$2.0M$4.4M$2.9M
EBITDA$4.3M$4.3M$4.2M$6.6M$3.8M
EPS——0.140.320.21
Gross Margin91.0%91.0%93.5%94.0%93.0%
Operating Margin18.7%18.7%21.3%31.6%20.5%
Net Margin25.9%25.9%12.1%24.4%18.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.230.230.410.200.28
Current Ratio3.853.85———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-832876.00$-832876.00$-523886.00$-382613.00$-2.0M
Returns
ROE19.7%19.7%12.3%31.3%31.1%
Valuation
P/E19.6319.6344.38——
EV/EBITDA22.2022.2021.84——
P/B3.793.795.48——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth17.9%17.9%-8.8%13.1%—
EPS Growth——-54.8%49.5%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -23.2%

Total return

-23.2%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.14 → n/d

Residual

-23.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-23.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.