StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
FEW0.SG$37.40+19.11%
Fair $37.40+0.0%

FEW0.SG

FEW0.SG

Technology / Communication EquipmentStuttgart

$37.40

+6.00 (+19.11%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $37.40Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 53/C
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 26% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $7.0M · quality 39.0/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 42/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

53/100

C

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 0unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · FEW0.SGLocal privado en este navegador · FEW0.SG
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$301M

P/E

18.6x

↓

EV/EBITDA

8.2x

↓

ROE

20.0%

↑

Gross Margin

57.0%

↑

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$37
$26$39

TradingView lightweight chart

FEW0.SG price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $37.40Periodo +130.9%
Fair value: $37.40

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2023 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+11.4%

FCF CAGR

-45.1%

FCF margin

4.5%

FCF / Net income

0.41x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $156.3M · net income $17.3M · FCF $7.0M

2021-FY → 2023-FY

Gross margin

57.0%-5.9% pts

Operating margin

17.1%-10.7% pts

Net margin

11.1%-7.8% pts

FCF margin

4.5%-14.1% pts
MetricTTM
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$156.3M$156.3M$132.1M$125.9M
Net Income$17.3M$17.3M$19.5M$23.8M
EBITDA$31.8M$31.8M$30.7M$36.8M
EPS2.152.152.422.95
Gross Margin57.0%57.0%57.3%62.9%
Operating Margin17.1%17.1%21.6%27.9%
Net Margin11.1%11.1%14.8%18.9%
Balance Sheet
Current Ratio8.678.67——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$7.0M$7.0M$2.2M$23.4M
Returns
ROE20.0%20.0%24.0%34.0%
Valuation
P/E18.6118.619.0310.71
EV/EBITDA8.198.194.104.86
P/B3.483.482.173.64
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth18.3%18.3%4.9%—
EPS Growth-11.4%-11.4%-17.8%—
Dividend Yield2.4%2.4%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

15.6%

exigente

EPS terminal req.

$3.32

Spread vs growth

-27.0%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

13.3%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$4.02

Spread vs growth

-24.7%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

11.7%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$6.47

Spread vs growth

-23.0%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +40.9%

Total return

+40.9%

Start / end P/E

11.1x → 17.4x

EPS bridge

2.42 → 2.15

Residual

-6.4%

EPS growth-11.4%
Multiple rerating+56.3%
Dividend+2.4%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-6.4%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.