StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
FLSP.BR$19.00+0.00%
Fair $19.00+0.0%

FLSP.BR

Flowsparks NV

Technology / Software - ApplicationBrussels

$19.00

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $19.00Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 22/D
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 26% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $1.7M · quality 54.7/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 62/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

22/100

D

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · FLSP.BRLocal privado en este navegador · Flowsparks NV
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$41M

P/E

29.2x

↑

EV/EBITDA

18.1x

↑

ROE

21.9%

↑

Gross Margin

21.4%

↓

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$19
$16$28

TradingView lightweight chart

FLSP.BR price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $19.00Periodo +164.3%
Fair value: $19.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2024 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+7.9%

FCF CAGR

+4.8%

FCF margin

23.3%

FCF / Net income

1.62x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $9.8M · net income $1.4M · FCF $2.3M

2021-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

21.4%-0.5% pts

Operating margin

19.7%-2.0% pts

Net margin

14.4%-2.7% pts

FCF margin

23.3%-2.2% pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$9.8M$9.8M$9.6M$7.9M$7.8M
Net Income$1.4M$1.4M$1.1M$1.4M$1.3M
EBITDA$2.1M$2.1M$1.7M$1.9M$1.7M
EPS——0.510.630.62
Gross Margin21.4%21.4%22.2%23.4%21.9%
Operating Margin19.7%19.7%20.4%22.5%21.7%
Net Margin14.4%14.4%11.4%17.2%17.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity———0.020.06
Current Ratio1.521.52———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$2.3M$2.3M$-58947.00$1.7M$2.0M
Returns
ROE21.9%21.9%17.1%18.3%21.8%
Valuation
P/E29.2329.2345.2936.3230.96
EV/EBITDA18.0718.0727.0124.3022.62
P/B6.396.397.746.646.75
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth2.2%2.2%20.8%1.9%—
EPS Growth——-19.8%2.7%—
Dividend Yield3.4%3.4%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +3.4%

Total return

+3.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.51 → n/d

Residual

-0.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+3.4%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-0.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.