Real Estate / REIT - SpecialtyNYSE
$10.30
+0.03 (+0.29%)
FCF base 3Y
n/d
n/d CAGR · yield n/d
FCF base 5Y
n/d
n/d base · n/d expected
Precio de entrada
n/d
MOS 100% · confianza 20%
FCF escenarios
weak_data · normalized FCF n/d · quality 26.0/100
Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.
SA Score
27/100
D
Piotroski
4/9
balance/quality
Valuation
50/100
+0.0% upside
5Y CAGR
+0.0%
50/100
Data QA
20/100
SEC 0%
Sin guardar todavía.
Market Cap
$457M
P/E
17.5x
↑EV/EBITDA
14.8x
↑ROE
6.9%
↑Gross Margin
80.3%
↑Debt/Equity
0.35
↓TradingView lightweight chart
Absolute Values (Left Axis)
Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)
Financial statement dashboard
2012–2025 · 13 años de histórico normalizado
Revenue CAGR
—
FCF CAGR
—
FCF margin
33.4%
FCF / Net income
0.55x
Latest source
Provider fallback
Margin decomposition
Último año: revenue $52.2M · net income $31.5M · FCF $17.4M
Gross margin
Operating margin
Net margin
FCF margin
| Metric | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income Statement | |||||||||||||||
| Revenue | $52.2M | $52.2M | $58.2M | $57.5M | $61.2M | $51.7M | $50.7M | $53.6M | $56.1M | $46.2M | $31.0M | — | — | — | — |
| Net Income | $31.5M | $31.5M | $59.9M | $30.9M | $11.7M | $10.0M | $7.1M | $13.9M | $12.3M | $7.9M | $4.3M | $1.2M | $-568000.00 | $34172.00 | $586352.00 |
| EBITDA | $46.0M | $46.0M | $85.9M | $61.7M | $35.3M | $24.4M | $30.3M | $34.7M | $38.2M | $30.3M | $17.2M | $7.1M | $886000.00 | $1.5M | $1.9M |
| EPS | 0.61 | 0.61 | 1.06 | 0.53 | 0.16 | -0.17 | -0.18 | 0.04 | -0.01 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.08 | -0.15 | — | — |
| Gross Margin | 80.3% | 80.3% | 80.6% | 76.7% | 76.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 44.2% | 44.2% | 43.8% | 41.5% | 41.0% | 32.5% | 44.1% | 49.2% | 53.0% | 48.7% | 50.4% | — | — | — | — |
| Net Margin | 60.5% | 60.5% | 102.9% | 53.8% | 19.1% | 19.3% | 14.0% | 25.9% | 21.9% | 17.1% | 13.9% | — | — | — | — |
| Balance Sheet | |||||||||||||||
| Debt/Equity | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.42 | 0.70 | 0.75 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Current Ratio | 1.93 | 1.93 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Cash Flow | |||||||||||||||
| Free Cash Flow | $17.4M | $17.4M | $16.1M | $12.9M | $17.1M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Returns | |||||||||||||||
| ROE | 6.9% | 6.9% | 12.4% | 6.0% | 2.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Valuation | |||||||||||||||
| P/E | 17.46 | 17.46 | 11.21 | 22.42 | 80.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.79 | 14.79 | 9.21 | 17.00 | 30.65 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B | 1.15 | 1.15 | 1.38 | 1.34 | 1.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Growth & Yield | |||||||||||||||
| Revenue Growth | -10.4% | -10.4% | 1.3% | -6.1% | — | 2.1% | -5.4% | -4.5% | 21.3% | 49.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth | -42.5% | -42.5% | 100.0% | 231.3% | — | 5.6% | -550.0% | 500.0% | -133.3% | -66.7% | 12.5% | 153.3% | — | — | — |
| Dividend Yield | 3.5% | 3.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)
Margins (%)
Returns (%)
Leverage & Liquidity
3Y implied EPS CAGR
14.4%
EPS terminal req.
$0.91
Spread vs growth
-56.9%
5Y implied EPS CAGR
12.6%
EPS terminal req.
$1.11
Spread vs growth
-55.1%
10Y implied EPS CAGR
11.3%
EPS terminal req.
$1.78
Spread vs growth
-53.8%
Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.
Total return
-5.5%
Start / end P/E
10.7x → 16.9x
EPS bridge
1.06 → 0.61
Residual
-24.7%
Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.