StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
FREQ.V$0.30+0.00%
Fair $0.30+0.0%

FREQ.V

Frequency Exchange Corp.

Healthcare / Medical DevicesTSXV

$0.30

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.30Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 37/D
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 22%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-1.1M · quality 61.3/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 36/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

37/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Book/ROE model only applies to financial balance-sheet businesses. ROE is -2.6%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · FREQ.VLocal privado en este navegador · Frequency Exchange Corp.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$18M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-262.8%

↓

Gross Margin

64.6%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.75

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

FREQ.V price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.300Periodo -25.0%
Fair value: $0.300

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+8.2%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-137.9%

FCF / Net income

0.72x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $886467.0 · net income $-1.7M · FCF $-1.2M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

64.6%+2.5% pts

Operating margin

-186.6%+155.2% pts

Net margin

-190.7%+504.2% pts

FCF margin

-137.9%+98.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$886467.00$886467.00$1.0M$829700.00$699092.00
Net Income$-1.7M$-1.7M$-1.2M$-1.4M$-4.9M
EBITDA$-1.6M$-1.6M$-1.1M$-1.3M$-4.7M
EPS-0.03-0.03-0.03-0.04-0.14
Gross Margin64.6%64.6%68.1%62.0%62.2%
Operating Margin-186.6%-186.6%-108.9%-171.5%-341.8%
Net Margin-190.7%-190.7%-112.8%-173.0%-695.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.750.75-1.46-1.152.18
Current Ratio1.341.34———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-1.2M$-1.2M$-683183.00$-1.1M$-1.6M
Returns
ROE-262.8%-262.8%265.9%274.8%-1454.4%
Valuation
P/B23.8423.84——12.68
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-15.4%-15.4%26.3%18.7%—
EPS Growth0.0%0.0%25.0%71.4%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +30.4%

Total return

+30.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.03 → -0.03

Residual

+30.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+30.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.