StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
FRIGO.AT$0.36-3.97%
Fair $0.36+0.0%

FRIGO.AT

Frigoglass S.A.I.C.

Industrials / Specialty Industrial MachineryAthens

$0.36

-0.01 (-3.97%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.36Fund rank 25/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 28/D
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-1.6M · quality 50.3/100

Data gap 25/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 31/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

28/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -6.5%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · FRIGO.ATLocal privado en este navegador · Frigoglass S.A.I.C.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$44M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

54.2x

↑

ROE

-6.5%

↓

Gross Margin

27.4%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.98

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

FRIGO.AT price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.363Periodo -99.8%
Fair value: $0.363

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2025 · 4 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

-42.3%

FCF margin

2.9%

FCF / Net income

-0.83x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $18.9M · net income $-651000.0 · FCF $542000.0

2021-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

27.4%— pts

Operating margin

-1.4%— pts

Net margin

-3.5%— pts

FCF margin

2.9%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$18.9M$18.9M———
Net Income$-651000.00$-651000.00$-1.4M$-10.1M$-5.7M
EBITDA$873000.00$873000.00$854000.00$-10.5M$16.6M
EPS-0.01-0.01-0.02-0.11-0.06
Gross Margin27.4%27.4%———
Operating Margin-1.4%-1.4%———
Net Margin-3.5%-3.5%———
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.980.98—32.60—
Current Ratio1.441.44———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$542000.00$542000.00$-1.6M$-4.7M$4.9M
Returns
ROE-6.5%-6.5%-165.5%-525.5%4.2%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA54.2254.2224.45—-0.81
P/B3.923.9225.5717.22—
Growth & Yield
EPS Growth64.3%64.3%85.2%-77.5%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +24.3%

Total return

+24.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.02 → -0.01

Residual

+24.3%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+24.3%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.