StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
GASS$9.35+1.85%
Fair $9.35+0.0%

GASS

StealthGas Inc.

Industrials / Marine ShippingNasdaqGS

$9.35

+0.17 (+1.85%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $9.35Fund rank 35/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 55/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 31% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $77.4M · quality 68.3/100

Data gap 35/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 58/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

55/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists.
Thesis & Journal · GASSLocal privado en este navegador · StealthGas Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$348M

P/E

5.7x

↓

EV/EBITDA

3.0x

↓

ROE

8.8%

↑

Gross Margin

39.2%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.00

↓
52-Week Range$9
$6$11

TradingView lightweight chart

GASS price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $9.350Periodo -32.2%
Fair value: $9.350

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+4.3%

FCF CAGR

+26.0%

FCF margin

49.0%

FCF / Net income

1.40x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $173.2M · net income $60.6M · FCF $84.8M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

39.2%+9.8% pts

Operating margin

31.8%+8.1% pts

Net margin

35.0%+12.6% pts

FCF margin

49.0%+21.2% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$173.2M$173.2M$167.3M$143.5M$152.8M
Net Income$60.6M$60.6M$69.9M$51.9M$34.3M
EBITDA$83.2M$83.2M$89.5M$73.4M$63.4M
EPS——1.901.370.90
Gross Margin39.2%39.2%44.5%35.4%29.4%
Operating Margin31.8%31.8%35.8%28.6%23.7%
Net Margin35.0%35.0%41.8%36.2%22.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.000.000.140.220.54
Current Ratio9.309.30———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$84.8M$84.8M$-2.7M$77.4M$42.3M
Returns
ROE8.8%8.8%11.2%9.4%6.6%
Valuation
P/E5.705.703.165.452.88
EV/EBITDA2.992.992.424.425.04
P/B0.500.500.340.510.19
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth3.5%3.5%16.5%-6.0%—
EPS Growth——38.7%52.2%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +56.9%

Total return

+56.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

1.90 → n/d

Residual

+56.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+56.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.