StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
GBT.PA$10.46-2.24%
Fair $10.46+0.0%

GBT.PA

Guerbet SA

Healthcare / Medical DevicesParis

$10.46

-0.24 (-2.24%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $10.46Fund rank 21/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 26/D
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 14%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $24.2M · quality 27.7/100

Data gap 21/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 15/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

26/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -40.6%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · GBT.PALocal privado en este navegador · Guerbet SA
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$132M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

6.3x

↓

ROE

-40.6%

↓

Gross Margin

70.9%

↑

Debt/Equity

1.65

↑
52-Week Range$10
$8$24

TradingView lightweight chart

GBT.PA price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $10.46Periodo +76.5%
Fair value: $10.46

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+1.2%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

5.6%

FCF / Net income

-0.41x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $798.7M · net income $-108.3M · FCF $44.5M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

70.9%-1.7% pts

Operating margin

1.0%-4.6% pts

Net margin

-13.6%-8.2% pts

FCF margin

5.6%+8.2% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$798.7M$798.7M$851.1M$795.7M$769.5M
Net Income$-108.3M$-108.3M$16.1M$23.9M$-41.1M
EBITDA$72.6M$72.6M$113.0M$102.6M$99.3M
EPS——1.071.89-3.25
Gross Margin70.9%70.9%73.6%74.0%72.6%
Operating Margin1.0%1.0%5.7%4.9%5.6%
Net Margin-13.6%-13.6%1.9%3.0%-5.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.651.651.001.020.82
Current Ratio2.492.49———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$44.5M$44.5M$24.2M$-26.6M$-20.1M
Returns
ROE-40.6%-40.6%4.1%6.3%-10.8%
Valuation
P/E——25.539.77—
EV/EBITDA6.316.316.105.544.94
P/B0.490.490.870.620.58
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-6.2%-6.2%7.0%3.4%—
EPS Growth——-43.3%158.1%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -50.7%

Total return

-50.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

1.07 → n/d

Residual

-50.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-50.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.