StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
GELS$0.48-0.82%
Fair $0.48+0.0%

GELS

Gelteq Limited

Healthcare / Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericNasdaqCM

$0.48

-0.00 (-0.82%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.48Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 12/F
F-Score: 0/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 23%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-1.8M · quality 68.7/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 33/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

12/100

F

Piotroski

0/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -42.0%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · GELSLocal privado en este navegador · Gelteq Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$5M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-42.0%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.27

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$4

TradingView lightweight chart

GELS price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.485Periodo -83.5%
Fair value: $0.485

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+3.9%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-3721.1%

FCF / Net income

0.93x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $165645.0 · net income $-6.6M · FCF $-6.2M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

-2989.0%-823.9% pts

Net margin

-4011.9%-1728.4% pts

FCF margin

-3721.1%-2699.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$165645.00$165645.00—$79843.00$147536.00
Net Income$-6.6M$-6.6M$-3.5M$-3.5M$-3.4M
EBITDA$-3.5M$-3.5M$-1.7M$-1.9M$-2.0M
EPS——-0.38-0.37-0.36
Gross Margin———38.7%35.7%
Operating Margin-2989.0%-2989.0%—-4232.9%-2165.1%
Net Margin-4011.9%-4011.9%—-4391.4%-2283.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.270.270.250.130.07
Current Ratio0.270.27———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-6.2M$-6.2M$-1.2M$-1.8M$-1.5M
Returns
ROE-42.0%-42.0%-23.5%-18.8%-16.2%
Valuation
P/B0.310.31———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth———-45.9%—
EPS Growth——-1.1%-4.1%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -69.7%

Total return

-69.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.38 → n/d

Residual

-69.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-69.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.