StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
GENT.OL$35.00+1.41%
Fair $35.00+0.0%

GENT.OL

Gentian Diagnostics ASA

Healthcare / Medical DevicesOslo

$35.00

+0.50 (+1.41%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $35.00Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 43/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 21%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $11.0M · quality 50.3/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 26/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

43/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · GENT.OLLocal privado en este navegador · Gentian Diagnostics ASA
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$541M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

12.9x

↑

ROE

6.5%

↑

Gross Margin

55.6%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.11

↓
52-Week Range$35
$34$66

TradingView lightweight chart

GENT.OL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $36.00Periodo +38.5%
Fair value: $35.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+20.2%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

18.0%

FCF / Net income

2.40x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $176.5M · net income $13.3M · FCF $31.8M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

55.6%+7.4% pts

Operating margin

14.4%+37.3% pts

Net margin

7.5%+30.7% pts

FCF margin

18.0%+46.2% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$176.5M$176.5M$152.1M$135.2M$101.6M
Net Income$13.3M$13.3M$45.3M$-10.6M$-23.6M
EBITDA$35.5M$35.5M$29.7M$-5000.00$-12.1M
EPS——2.87-0.69-1.53
Gross Margin55.6%55.6%54.5%47.5%48.2%
Operating Margin14.4%14.4%10.3%-9.4%-22.9%
Net Margin7.5%7.5%29.8%-7.9%-23.2%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.110.110.050.090.10
Current Ratio5.705.70———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$31.8M$31.8M$2.5M$11.0M$-28.6M
Returns
ROE6.5%6.5%23.3%-7.3%-15.3%
Valuation
P/E——13.94——
EV/EBITDA12.8912.8918.72——
P/B2.632.633.254.314.19
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth16.1%16.1%12.5%33.0%—
EPS Growth——515.9%54.9%—
Dividend Yield1.7%1.7%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -36.9%

Total return

-36.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

2.87 → n/d

Residual

-38.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+1.7%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-38.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.