StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
GHVINFRA.BO$210.60-4.99%
Fair $210.60+0.0%

GHVINFRA.BO

GHV Infra Projects Ltd

Industrials / Engineering & ConstructionBSE

$210.60

-11.05 (-4.99%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $210.60Fund rank 22/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 33/D
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 20%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-563.3M · quality 42.3/100

Data gap 22/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 24/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

33/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · GHVINFRA.BOLocal privado en este navegador · GHV Infra Projects Ltd
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$15.2B

P/E

32.0x

↑

EV/EBITDA

17.2x

↑

ROE

37.3%

↑

Gross Margin

68.5%

↑

Debt/Equity

1.46

↑
52-Week Range$211
$123$369

TradingView lightweight chart

GHVINFRA.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $210.60Periodo +1332.7%
Fair value: $210.60

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-10.9%

FCF / Net income

-1.37x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $6.15B · net income $490.2M · FCF $-669.9M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

68.5%— pts

Operating margin

15.7%— pts

Net margin

8.0%— pts

FCF margin

-10.9%— pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$6.15B$6.15B$1.83B——
Net Income$490.2M$490.2M$171.5M$-4.3M$-1.6M
EBITDA$989.1M$989.1M$244.5M$-4.3M$-1.6M
EPS——35.47-6.21-2.23
Gross Margin68.5%68.5%13.7%——
Operating Margin15.7%15.7%13.6%——
Net Margin8.0%8.0%9.4%——
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.461.460.73——
Current Ratio1.461.46———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-669.9M$-669.9M$-563.3M$33000.00—
Returns
ROE37.3%37.3%40.3%54.4%42.7%
Valuation
P/E32.0132.011.85——
EV/EBITDA17.2017.207.74——
P/B11.5411.543.72——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth236.4%236.4%———
EPS Growth——671.2%-178.5%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +71.0%

Total return

+71.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

35.47 → n/d

Residual

+71.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+71.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.