StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
GLDE.TA$217.00-2.91%
Fair $217.00+0.0%

GLDE.TA

Golden Energy Power Ltd

Communication Services / Telecom ServicesTel Aviv

$217.00

-6.50 (-2.91%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $217.00Fund rank 23/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 23/D
F-Score: 2/9
High DebtLow Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 15%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-4.8M · quality 42.0/100

Data gap 23/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 30/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

23/100

D

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 2unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. Debt-to-Equity ratio is 2.41, above the 2.0 threshold ROE is -6.7%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · GLDE.TALocal privado en este navegador · Golden Energy Power Ltd
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$52M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-665.4%

↓

Gross Margin

29.2%

↓

Debt/Equity

2.41

↑
52-Week Range$217
$2$240

TradingView lightweight chart

GLDE.TA price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $232.30Periodo -100.0%
Fair value: $217.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-78.6%

FCF / Net income

0.29x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $14.5M · net income $-38.8M · FCF $-11.4M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

29.2%— pts

Operating margin

-264.5%— pts

Net margin

-267.5%— pts

FCF margin

-78.6%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$14.5M$14.5M———
Net Income$-38.8M$-38.8M$-22.6M$-6.7M$-6.4M
EBITDA$-34.9M$-34.9M$-21.7M$-5.8M$-5.8M
EPS——-4.94-3.01-2.88
Gross Margin29.2%29.2%———
Operating Margin-264.5%-264.5%———
Net Margin-267.5%-267.5%———
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity2.412.410.12-1.38—
Current Ratio0.670.67———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-11.4M$-11.4M$-4.8M$-4.8M$-5.9M
Returns
ROE-665.4%-665.4%-488.9%67.0%-86.5%
Valuation
P/B802.85802.855.75—2.31
Growth & Yield
EPS Growth——-64.1%-4.5%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +5414.6%

Total return

+5414.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-4.94 → n/d

Residual

+5414.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+5414.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.